Modern Philosophers: Seven Perspectives on Wisdom in Our Times

Maria Fonseca

Mon Jun 16 2025

 

In an era marked by fragmentation, speed, and existential threat, the question of wisdom has never been more urgent. But what does wisdom mean today—and who among us is cultivating it? Across continents and disciplines, a new generation of philosophers is reimagining wisdom not as abstract speculation, but as a lived, embodied, and often courageous response to the crises and complexities of modern life. This article explores seven contemporary thinkers … and doers, that I follow and love —Cornel West, Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum, Jonathan Rowson, Raimon Panikkar, Rebecca Goldstein, Bayo Akomolafe and Ken Wilber. Their  distinct perspectives help us navigate the moral, spiritual, and civic terrain of the 21st century offering/exploring the different facets of a kaleidoscope of wisdom.

Cornel West: Prophetic Wisdom and the Love of Democracy
Cornel West brings the fire of prophetic tradition into the public square, insisting that wisdom demands more than knowledge—it requires moral courage, historical awareness, and a fierce love of justice. For West, democracy is not just a system but a spiritual practice, grounded in humility and solidarity with the vulnerable. His writings, such as the iconic Race Matters and Democracy Matters, expose the wounds of racism and economic inequality, but never without hope. West calls for what he terms "deep democracy," animated by the radical love of others.

“Never forget that justice is what love looks like in public.” —Cornel West

West’s prophetic stance contrasts with the technocratic coolness often found in public discourse, yet it finds a quiet ally in the deliberative ethics of Amartya Sen.

As Cornell says:

“Democracy is always a movement of an energized public to make elites responsible—it is at its core and most basic foundation the taking back of one's powers in the face of the misuse of elite power… Democracy is more a verb than a noun … a cultural way of being.”

Amartya Sen: Reason, Freedom, and the Ethics of Development
Amartya Sen, an economist and philosopher, shares West’s passion for justice but approaches it through the lens of reasoned public debate and economic policy. Sen’s capabilities approach—developed in works like Development as Freedom—argues that justice must be measured not by wealth, but by what people are able to be and do. While West speaks in the cadence of spiritual prophecy, Sen makes a case for wisdom as democratic dialogue grounded in evidence and ethics.

“Poverty is not just a lack of income. It is a deprivation of basic capabilities.” —Amartya Sen

Their approaches complement one another: West gives us the passion of ethical vision, Sen gives us its framework in the world of policy and governance working towards more opportunities for all. Together, they challenge the false divide between emotion and reason, activism and analysis.

Martha Nussbaum: Compassion and the Fragility of Goodness
Martha Nussbaum joins this conversation by restoring the emotional dimension to moral reasoning. In The Fragility of Goodness and Creating Capabilities, she explores how human flourishing depends not only on rights and rules but on our capacity for compassion, empathy, and practical wisdom (phronesis). Like Sen, she believes in the centrality of human dignity. But where Sen highlights rational debate, Nussbaum insists that emotions are forms of moral perception, not distractions from truth.

“To be a good human being is to have a kind of openness to the world, an ability to trust uncertain things beyond your own control.” —Martha Nussbaum

Her perspective resonates with West’s call for love and Sen’s concern for freedom, offering a psychologically rich and education-focused understanding of how societies can be wise.

Jonathan Rowson: Wisdom in the Age of Metacrisis
If West, Sen, and Nussbaum address the moral and civic crises of modernity, Jonathan Rowson turns our gaze to the civilizational challenge itself. A former chess grandmaster turned philosopher, Rowson sees wisdom as the ability to hold complexity, uncertainty, and paradox without collapsing into despair. His work at the think tank Perspectiva explores how inner development, culture, and systems thinking must converge to address what he calls the metacrisis: a crisis of perception, meaning, and governance all at once. Metacrisis, for Rowson, is then  the historically specific threat to truth, beauty, and goodness caused by our persistent misunderstanding, misvaluing, and misappropriating of reality. He says:

“Wisdom is not just knowing what to do, but becoming the kind of person who sees what needs to be done.” —Jonathan Rowson

Rowson’s emphasis on the inner life and “wisdom intelligence” deepens the civic moral frameworks of his predecessors, suggesting that public transformation requires personal metamorphosis.

Raimon Panikkar: The Interbeing of Cosmos, God, and Self
Raimon Panikkar, meanwhile, dissolves the very boundaries between self, world, and divine that many Western thinkers take for granted. His cosmotheandric vision proposes that reality is an inseparable unity of cosmos (nature), theos (divinity), and anthropos (human). Wisdom, for Panikkar, is interbeing—a lived awareness of radical interconnectedness. Where Nussbaum speaks of fragility and Rowson of metacrisis, Panikkar offers mystical depth and intercultural sensitivity, drawing from Hinduism, Christianity, and Buddhism.

“We are not in the world, we are the world. We are not separate from God, the divine is in us.” —Raimon Panikkar

Panikkar’s view reminds us that wisdom traditions need not divide science and spirit, East and West, human and more-than-human. He shares with Rowson a commitment to transformation at both the personal and planetary levels.

Rebecca Goldstein: Rationality and the Modern Soul
Rebecca Goldstein stands out for her defense of reason in a time when relativism and anti-intellectualism threaten public discourse. In Plato at the Googleplex, she argues that philosophy remains relevant because it teaches us how to live examined lives, even—or especially—in an age of data and algorithms. Goldstein believes that wisdom requires the union of rational inquiry, moral depth, and narrative imagination.

“There is such a thing as moral truth. We may disagree about it, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.” —Rebecca Goldstein

Where Panikkar finds wisdom in mystical synthesis, Goldstein roots it in secular humanism. Yet both defend the idea that wisdom transcends mere technical expertise—it is about how we live, not just what we know.

Bayo Akomolafe: Slowness, Ancestry, and the Rupture of Modernity
Finally, Bayo Akomolafe offers a poetic, unsettling challenge to the entire modern project. A Nigerian philosopher, psychologist, and storyteller, Akomolafe speaks of wisdom as decolonial unknowing—a turning toward slowness, earth, and ancestral ways of seeing. For him, wisdom is not a system or a solution but a radical receptivity to the cracks in our certainties. He urges us to “flee the burning house of modernity” and listen to what we have forgotten.

“The times are urgent; let us slow down.” —Bayo Akomolafe

His call contrasts sharply with the reformist optimism of Sen or the analytic clarity of Goldstein. Yet all share a concern for human flourishing—and a belief that wisdom is relational, not reducible to knowledge.

Ken Wilber: Integral Theory and the Evolution of Consciousness
Ken Wilber offers perhaps the broadest synthetic vision. His Integral Theory maps the evolution of wisdom across four dimensions: subjective (inner experience), intersubjective (culture), objective (science), and interobjective (systems). He argues that true wisdom must integrate these quadrants, evolving through stages from ego-centric to world-centric to cosmos-centric awareness. His framework, unlike any other, embraces mysticism, neuroscience, systems theory, and developmental psychology in one coherent vision.

“Everybody is right. More specifically, everybody—every perspective—is true but partial.” —Ken Wilber

Wilber provides a scaffolding in which all the previous thinkers could coexist. West’s prophetic fire, Sen’s deliberative ethics, Nussbaum’s emotions, Rowson’s metacrisis, Panikkar’s mysticism, Goldstein’s reason, and Akomolafe’s rupture all find their quadrant, their level, their line of development in Wilber’s model.

Wisdom as a Multidimensional Practice


The modern philosopher is no longer cloistered in ivory towers but engaged in a polyphonic, global, and urgent inquiry into how we might live, lead, and love well. Cornel West reminds us to speak truth with fire; Amartya Sen to reason together in justice; Martha Nussbaum to feel wisely; Jonathan Rowson to transform perception; Raimon Panikkar to live the unity of being; Rebecca Goldstein to defend truth in a secular age; Bayo Akomolafe to fall into mystery—and Ken Wilber to hold it all, in a framework that is as expansive as consciousness itself.

These thinkers do not agree on everything. But they share a vital intuition: that wisdom is not a possession but a practice—a dance between clarity and compassion, between structure and surrender. If the future is to be wise, it must learn to think in many voices. And perhaps, just perhaps, to hear the silence between them.

Share this

Maria Fonseca

Maria Fonseca is an interdisciplinary educator, writer, artist and researcher whose work bridges the realms of academic knowledge, community engagement, and spiritual inquiry. With a background in Fine Art and a doctorate in creative practice, Maria has spent over a decade exploring the intersections of human experience, cultural meaning, and collective transformation.