homearrowThe Participatory Universe: How Consciousness Shapes Reality

The Participatory Universe: How Consciousness Shapes Reality

Dinis GuardaAuthor

Wed Dec 03 2025

article cover

What if the past isn't fixed until you observe it? Wheeler's quantum experiments prove consciousness participates in creating reality. Explore the science that bridges physics and philosophy in Part 1 of Dinis's groundbreaking work.

When Physics Met Philosophy at the Quantum Edge

An exploration of John Archibald Wheeler's revolutionary discovery that we are not merely observers of reality, we are participants in its creation

From Dinis Guarda's mini-book “Quantum Consciousness Reality”

John Archibald Wheeler - Wikipedia
John Archibald Wheeler

In 1977, theoretical physicist John Archibald Wheeler unveiled a principle that would fundamentally challenge humanity's understanding of existence itself. Through decades of quantum research, Wheeler demonstrated something extraordinary: consciousness is not a passive witness to an objective universe but an active participant in reality's actualization.

This wasn't mysticism dressed in scientific language. This was rigorous experimental physics arriving at a conclusion that ancient wisdom traditions had intuited for millennia, that the observer and the observed are not separate entities but partners in an ongoing dialogue that brings reality into being.

The Strange World of Quantum Mechanics

The Double-Slit Experiment: Reality's First Clue

Double Slit Trouble. | The Scientific Gamer
Double Slit

The journey begins with one of physics' most elegant and disturbing experiments. In 1801, Thomas Young shone light through two narrow slits onto a screen. Instead of two bright bands (as particles would create), an interference pattern emerged, alternating light and dark stripes characteristic of overlapping waves.

But quantum mechanics revealed something far stranger. When scientists sent individual photons or electrons through the apparatus one at a time, the interference pattern still appeared, as if each particle somehow "knew" about both slits and interfered with itself.

Quantum double-slit experiment done with molecules for the first time |  Research | Chemistry World
Quantum double-slit experiment done with molecules for the first time

The shocking twist: when detectors were placed at the slits to observe which path each particle took, the interference pattern vanished entirely. Particles behaved like particles when watched, and like waves when unwatched.

The act of measurement fundamentally altered the behavior of the system. This wasn't crude measurement disturbing a pre-existing reality. The mathematics of quantum mechanics, verified by countless experiments, indicated that prior to measurement, particles genuinely existed in a superposition of all possible states.

As Werner Heisenberg wrote in Physics and Philosophy

The atoms or elementary particles themselves are not real; they form a world of potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts.

Niels Bohr, one of the founding architects of quantum theory, put it even more directly: 

It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature.

The observer, through observation itself, collapses possibility into actuality.

Wheeler's Radical Extension: The Delayed-Choice Experiment

The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser – does the future affect the past? |  Horizon IIT Madras
The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser – does the future affect the past?

Wheeler pushed this insight to its logical, and unsettling, extreme. In 1978, he proposed an experiment that would demonstrate something even more remarkable: that present observations could influence past states.

The delayed-choice experiment works as follows: light from a distant quasar splits around a gravitational lens, creating two possible paths. Experimenters can choose, after the photon has already "decided" which path to take, whether to measure which path it took (revealing particle behavior) or to recombine the paths and look for interference (revealing wave behavior).

The stunning result showed that the choice made by experimenters in the present determines whether the photon traveled as a wave or particle in the past.

When this thought experiment was actually performed, by Alain Aspect in 1982 and later by teams at the Australian National University in 2015, the results confirmed Wheeler's prediction. As Jacques and colleagues demonstrated in their 2007 Science paper, the measurement made on the photon in the present determines its past behavior.

Wheeler summarized this with characteristic elegance: 

We have to say that we decide what a photon shall have done after it has done it.

This wasn't time travel. It was something more profound: the recognition that reality's fabric is woven from actualities that crystallize from potentialities through observation. The past itself remains in superposition until present measurement collapses it into a single history.

As Wheeler himself wrote: 

"The past has no  except as it is recorded in the present."

"It From Bitexistence": Information as the Foundation of Reality

John Archibald Wheeler Postulates "It from Bit" : History of Information
John Archibald Wheeler Postulates "It from Bit" : History of Information

From these experimental foundations, Wheeler developed a revolutionary framework he called “it from bit”, the idea that every physical quantity, every "it," derives its ultimate significance from binary yes-or-no answers to observational questions, from "bits."

Wheeler articulated that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin, and this is a participatory universe.

This was Wheeler's great synthesis: information doesn't merely describe reality, information constitutes reality. Every observation, every measurement, every act of conscious attention extracts bits of information from the quantum foam of possibility, collapsing wavefunctions and crystallizing actuality from potentiality.

As physicist Anton Zeilinger later demonstrated, an elementary quantum system carries precisely one bit of information, establishing information as the fundamental currency of physical reality itself.

The Entangled Universe: No Part Is Truly Separate

Entangled universe: Could wormholes hold the cosmos together? | New  Scientist
Entangled universe: Could wormholes hold the cosmos together? | New Scientist

Wheeler's participatory framework gains profound support from Bell's theorem and the experimental verification of quantum entanglement. When two particles interact and become entangled, measuring one particle's state instantaneously determines the other's state, regardless of the distance separating them.

This "spooky action at a distance" (as Einstein dismissively called it) has been verified across increasingly vast distances. Nicolas Gisin demonstrated quantum entanglement persisting across 18 kilometers of optical fiber, while Chinese researchers achieved quantum teleportation between ground stations and satellites 1,400 kilometers apart.

Einstein himself, despite his skepticism, inadvertently highlighted the profound mystery: 

I cannot seriously believe in [quantum theory] because it cannot be reconciled with the idea that physics should represent a reality in time and space, free from spooky actions at a distance.

Yet the experiments proved him wrong, reality itself is non-local.

For Wheeler's participatory principle, entanglement reveals something profound: the boundaries between observer and observed, between separate systems, are not fundamental but emerge from deeper unity. As physicist David Bohm articulated in his interpretation of quantum mechanics, there exists an “implicate order”, an undivided wholeness from which the "explicate order" of seemingly separate objects unfolds.

Erwin Schrödinger, whose famous cat thought experiment illuminated quantum paradoxes, recognized this unity: 

The total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings.

Schrödinger's Cat - A Thought Experiment in Quantum Mechanics
Schrödinger's Cat - A Thought Experiment in Quantum Mechanics

If consciousness operates according to quantum principles, then individual awareness may not be as isolated as classical physics suggests. The signals we transmit may propagate through non-local connections, participating in shaping probability fields far beyond our immediate environment.

The Classical Illusion: Why Your Coffee Cup Stays Put

A crucial question emerges: if quantum superposition is fundamental, why does the everyday world appear solid and deterministic? Why doesn't your coffee cup exist in multiple places at once?

Quantum Decoherence, in a simple word - Iranian Quantum Technologies  Research Center

The answer lies in quantum decoherence. When quantum systems interact with their environment, air molecules, photons, thermal radiation, they rapidly lose quantum coherence, the delicate phase relationships that enable superposition and interference.

The mathematics is precise: decoherence timescales for macroscopic objects are extraordinarily short, on the order of 10-40 seconds for a dust particle. This is why we don't observe everyday objects in superposition; their quantum properties decohere essentially instantaneously.

What is quantum coherence? | Argonne National Laboratory

But decoherence isn't true collapse, it's the spreading of quantum coherence into the environment. The quantum information isn't destroyed; it's dispersed into increasingly complex entangled states with the surroundings.

For Wheeler's participatory framework, this provides a mechanism for understanding the observer's role. Which quantum states become "classical" reality depends partly on environmental interactions, including measurement interactions by conscious observers.

The Quality of Consciousness Matters

 

Quantum Biology and the Potential Role of Entanglement and Tunneling in  Non-Targeted Effects of Ionizing Radiation: A Review and Proposed Model
Quantum Information in Neural Systems

Here's where Wheeler's physics meets profound implications for human experience. Recent research suggests that certain biochemical systems in the brain might maintain quantum coherence for biologically significant timescales through mechanisms that protect against decoherence.

If consciousness can maintain coherence longer than purely classical systems, it may retain greater influence over which quantum states actualize.

This provides a physical mechanism for an ancient insight: the quality of our consciousness matters. Coherent, aligned mental states may literally maintain quantum coherence longer, enabling the actualization of lower-probability, higher-value outcomes. Fragmented, contradictory states accelerate decoherence, collapsing into incoherent mixed states that yield unpredictable results.

What Wheeler's Universe Means for You

Can Quantum Physics Explain Consciousness? - The Atlantic

Wheeler spent his life exploring the deepest mysteries of physics. His participatory principle may be his most profound gift: the scientific recognition that we are not witnesses to creation but participants in it.

As Carlo Rovelli writes: 

The universe is not a collection of objects, but a web of relationships.

The implications cascade outward:

You are not separate from the reality you observe. The boundary between observer and observed is not fundamental but emerges from measurement interactions. Your consciousness participates in collapsing quantum possibilities into actualities.

The past itself is not fixed until observed. Wheeler's delayed-choice experiments demonstrate that present observation influences which version of the past actualizes. Your attention now participates in determining what has been.

Information is the currency of reality. Every measurement, every observation, every conscious attention extracts bits of information from quantum possibility, crystallizing the potential into the actual.

Coherence matters. The quality of your consciousness, whether coherent or fragmented, focused or scattered, may influence which quantum states actualize through its effect on decoherence processes.

The Philosophical Bridge

The Truth About Quantum Waves and the Mystery of Consciousness
The Truth About Quantum Waves and the Mystery of Consciousness

Wheeler's work represents something rare: science arriving, through mathematical formalism and experimental rigor, at conclusions that bridge empirical and existential domains.

As Richard Feynman famously observed: 

I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics.

Perhaps what Feynman meant is that quantum mechanics doesn't fit within our classical intuitions about reality. It demands we reconceive our relationship to existence itself.

Max Planck, the father of quantum theory, recognized where this path led: 

I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

We are not discovering a pre-existing objective reality frozen in amber, waiting to be uncovered. We are participating in its ongoing creation, a continuous collapsing of quantum possibility into actuality through the choices we make, the attention we sustain, the coherence we maintain.

The universe, in Wheeler's elegant framework, is not a thing but an event. And you are not merely in that event, you are participating in its unfoldment with every observation, every measurement, every moment of conscious attention.

The Invitation

At this evolutionary threshold, humanity faces a choice embedded in Wheeler's physics: continue unconscious participation, transmitting habitual patterns shaped by conditioning and fear, or awaken to conscious participation, recognizing our role as co-creators and accepting the magnificent responsibility that each moment carries.

Wheeler's delayed-choice experiments prove that the past remains in superposition until observed. The implications are staggering: the history we remember, the patterns we perpetuate, the reality we inhabit, all remain negotiable through present participation.

The participatory universe isn't a theory to believe or reject. It's an experimentally verified description of reality's architecture. The only question is whether we participate consciously or unconsciously, deliberately or habitually, as awakened co-creators or as sleepwalkers dreaming themselves victims of a fixed, objective world that quantum mechanics proves doesn't exist.

Wheeler gave us the physics. The practice is ours to develop.

A Question to Carry Forward

If the past remains in superposition until observed, what version of your history are you collapsing into reality right now? What signals are you transmitting, consciously or unconsciously, that are shaping the probability fields you'll navigate tomorrow?

Wheeler proved that observation changes outcomes. The double-slit experiment demonstrates it. The delayed-choice experiments confirm it. Quantum entanglement reveals the non-local nature of these effects.

But here's the deeper question: If you are not separate from the reality you observe, if your consciousness participates in actualizing quantum possibilities, if the quality of your attention influences which states decohere into classical reality, then who are you choosing to be in this participatory dialogue?

The universe is negotiating with you in every moment. What are you negotiating back?

Stay tuned for Part 2: "The Trinity of Signals: Identity, Information, and Action," where we explore the three specific mechanisms through which consciousness shapes reality, including the revolutionary implications of the Quantum Zeno Effect and how repeated observation literally freezes certain states into existence.

The physics is settled. The question is whether you'll participate consciously or unconsciously in the reality you're already creating.


"The past has no existence except as it is recorded in the present… The quantum principle shows that there is a sense in which what the observer will do in the future defines what happens in the past." — John Archibald Wheeler

 

Share this

Dinis Guarda

Author

Dinis Guarda is an author, entrepreneur, founder CEO of ztudium, Businessabc, citiesabc.com and Wisdomia.ai. Dinis is an AI leader, researcher and creator who has been building proprietary solutions based on technologies like digital twins, 3D, spatial computing, AR/VR/MR. Dinis is also an author of multiple books, including "4IR AI Blockchain Fintech IoT Reinventing a Nation" and others. Dinis has been collaborating with the likes of  UN / UNITAR, UNESCO, European Space Agency, IBM, Siemens, Mastercard, and governments like USAID, and Malaysia Government to mention a few. He has been a guest lecturer at business schools such as Copenhagen Business School. Dinis is ranked as one of the most influential people and thought leaders in Thinkers360 / Rise Global’s The Artificial Intelligence Power 100, Top 10 Thought leaders in AI, smart cities, metaverse, blockchain, fintech.